Philips W632 vs Sharp Aquos R2 compact

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos R2 compact: 29.5 g lighterAquos R2 compact: 135 g · W632: 164.5 g
• WidthW632: 1 mm narrowerW632: 63 mm · Aquos R2 compact: 64 mm
• Screen diagonalW632: 1.4 in smaller diagonalW632: 3.8 in · Aquos R2 compact: 5.2 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6573 (65 nm) / Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)W632: Mediatek MT6573 (65 nm) · Aquos R2 compact: Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)
• DepthAquos R2 compact: 4.7 mm thinnerAquos R2 compact: 9.3 mm · W632: 14 mm
• HeightW632: 7.6 mm shorterW632: 123.4 mm · Aquos R2 compact: 131 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W632

   Height

   123.4 mm

   Width

   63 mm

   Depth

   14 mm

   Weight

   164.5 g

2. 2. Aquos R2 compact

   Height

   131 mm

   Width

   64 mm

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   135 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.

Similar comparisons

• Y8p vs Aquos R2 compact