Philips W632 vs Unnecto Omnia

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthW632: 9.6 mm narrowerW632: 63 mm · Omnia: 72.6 mm
• Screen diagonalW632: 1.2 in smaller diagonalW632: 3.8 in · Omnia: 5 in
• DepthOmnia: 5.1 mm thinnerOmnia: 8.9 mm · W632: 14 mm
• HeightW632: 19.5 mm shorterW632: 123.4 mm · Omnia: 142.9 mm
• Release year2012 / 2015W632: 2012 · Omnia: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W632

   Height

   123.4 mm

   Width

   63 mm

   Depth

   14 mm+5.1 mm versus Omnia

   Weight

   164.5 g

2. 2. Omnia

   Height

   142.9 mm+19.5 mm versus W632

   Width

   72.6 mm+9.6 mm versus W632

   Depth

   8.9 mm

   Weight

   163 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. W632 3.8 in · 5:3 About 41.1 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Omnia 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Omnia has approximately 67.7% more rectangular screen area than W632.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.