Philips W736 vs Xolo Play

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthW736: 4.6 mm narrowerW736: 65.4 mm · Play: 70 mm
• Screen diagonalW736: 0.7 in smaller diagonalW736: 4 in · Play: 4.7 in
• DepthPlay: 1.7 mm thinnerPlay: 10.4 mm · W736: 12.1 mm
• HeightW736: 11.8 mm shorterW736: 126.6 mm · Play: 138.4 mm
• Release year2012 / 2013W736: 2012 · Play: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W736

   Height

   126.6 mm

   Width

   65.4 mm

   Depth

   12.1 mm+1.7 mm versus Play

   Weight

   167.5 g

2. 2. Play

   Height

   138.4 mm+11.8 mm versus W736

   Width

   70 mm+4.6 mm versus W736

   Depth

   10.4 mm

   Weight

   167 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. W736 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Play 4.7 in · 16:9 About 60.9 cm² rectangular area

Play has approximately 33.7% more rectangular screen area than W736.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.