Philips W820 vs Sonim XP6

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightW820: 127 g lighterW820: 143 g · XP6: 270 g
• WidthW820: 6.8 mm narrowerW820: 57.7 mm · XP6: 64.5 mm
• Screen diagonalXP6: 0.57 in smaller diagonalXP6: 2.63 in · W820: 3.2 in
• DepthW820: 5.7 mm thinnerW820: 14.8 mm · XP6: 20.5 mm
• HeightW820: 22.4 mm shorterW820: 114.6 mm · XP6: 137 mm
• Release year2012 / 2014W820: 2012 · XP6: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W820

   Height

   114.6 mm

   Width

   57.7 mm

   Depth

   14.8 mm

   Weight

   143 g

2. 2. XP6

   Height

   137 mm+22.4 mm versus W820

   Width

   64.5 mm+6.8 mm versus W820

   Depth

   20.5 mm+5.7 mm versus W820

   Weight

   270 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. W820 3.2 in · 3:2 About 30.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. XP6 2.63 in · 4:3 About 21.4 cm² rectangular area

W820 has approximately 42.3% more rectangular screen area than XP6.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.