Philips W920 vs Sharp Aquos SH80F

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthAquos SH80F: 6 mm narrowerAquos SH80F: 64 mm · W920: 70 mm
• DepthAquos SH80F: 1 mm thinnerAquos SH80F: 11.9 mm · W920: 12.9 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W920

   Height

   128 mm

   Width

   70 mm+6 mm versus Aquos SH80F

   Depth

   12.9 mm+1 mm versus Aquos SH80F

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. Aquos SH80F

   Height

   127 mm

   Width

   64 mm

   Depth

   11.9 mm

   Weight

   135 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. W920 4.3 in · 5:3 About 52.6 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Aquos SH80F 4.2 in · 16:9 About 48.6 cm² rectangular area

W920 has approximately 8.2% more rectangular screen area than Aquos SH80F.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.