Philips W930 vs Xolo Q2000L

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthW930: 20.2 mm narrowerW930: 57.8 mm · Q2000L: 78 mm
• Screen diagonalW930: 2.3 in smaller diagonalW930: 3.2 in · Q2000L: 5.5 in
• DepthQ2000L: 13.6 mm thinnerQ2000L: 8.4 mm · W930: 22 mm
• HeightW930: 45.7 mm shorterW930: 110 mm · Q2000L: 155.7 mm
• Release year2012 / 2014W930: 2012 · Q2000L: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W930

   Height

   110 mm

   Width

   57.8 mm

   Depth

   22 mm+13.6 mm versus Q2000L

   Weight

   250 g

2. 2. Q2000L

   Height

   155.7 mm+45.7 mm versus W930

   Width

   78 mm+20.2 mm versus W930

   Depth

   8.4 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. W930 3.2 in · 3:2 About 30.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Q2000L 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area

Q2000L has approximately 173.5% more rectangular screen area than W930.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.