Samsung I9103 Galaxy R vs Xolo LT900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  I9103 Galaxy R: 5 g lighter

  I9103 Galaxy R:

  135 g

  LT900:

  140 g

• Height

  I9103 Galaxy R: 3.7 mm shorter

  I9103 Galaxy R:

  125 mm

  LT900:

  128.7 mm

• Release year

  I9103 Galaxy R:

  2011

  LT900:

  2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. I9103 Galaxy R

   Height:

   125 mm

   Width:

   66 mm

   Depth:

   9.5 mm

2. 2. LT900

   Height:

   128.7 mm +3.7 mm versus I9103 Galaxy R

   Width:

   66 mm

   Depth:

   9.8 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. I9103 Galaxy R

   Screen diagonal:

   4.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   50.2 cm²

2. 2. LT900

   Screen diagonal:

   4.3 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   51 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.