Sharp Aquos B10 vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos B10: 5 g lighterAquos B10: 175 g · Q2000: 180 g
• WidthAquos B10: 5.9 mm narrowerAquos B10: 71.9 mm · Q2000: 77.8 mm
• Screen diagonalQ2000: 0.2 in smaller diagonalQ2000: 5.5 in · Aquos B10: 5.7 in
• ChipsetMediatek MT6750T (28 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)Aquos B10: Mediatek MT6750T (28 nm) · Q2000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos B10: Dual · Q2000: Single
• DepthAquos B10: 1 mm thinnerAquos B10: 8.8 mm · Q2000: 9.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos B10

   Height

   153.5 mm

   Width

   71.9 mm

   Depth

   8.8 mm

   Weight

   175 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.