Sharp Aquos C10 vs Xolo Cube 5.0

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthCube 5.0: 1 mm narrowerCube 5.0: 71 mm · Aquos C10: 72 mm
• Screen diagonalCube 5.0: 0.5 in smaller diagonalCube 5.0: 5 in · Aquos C10: 5.5 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) / Mediatek MT6582M (28 nm)Aquos C10: Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) · Cube 5.0: Mediatek MT6582M (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos C10: Dual · Cube 5.0: Single
• DepthCube 5.0: 1 mm thinnerCube 5.0: 6.9 mm · Aquos C10: 7.9 mm
• Release year2018 / 2015Aquos C10: 2018 · Cube 5.0: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos C10

   Height

   141.8 mm

   Width

   72 mm

   Depth

   7.9 mm

   Weight

   140 g

2. 2. Cube 5.0

   Height

   143 mm

   Width

   71 mm

   Depth

   6.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.