Sharp Aquos C10 vs Xolo LT900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthLT900: 6 mm narrowerLT900: 66 mm · Aquos C10: 72 mm
• Screen diagonalLT900: 1.2 in smaller diagonalLT900: 4.3 in · Aquos C10: 5.5 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 PlusAquos C10: Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) · LT900: Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos C10: Dual · LT900: Single
• DepthAquos C10: 1.9 mm thinnerAquos C10: 7.9 mm · LT900: 9.8 mm
• HeightLT900: 13.1 mm shorterLT900: 128.7 mm · Aquos C10: 141.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos C10

   Height

   141.8 mm

   Width

   72 mm

   Depth

   7.9 mm

   Weight

   140 g

2. 2. LT900

   Height

   128.7 mm

   Width

   66 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   140 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.