Sharp Aquos C10 vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos C10: 40 g lighterAquos C10: 140 g · Q2000: 180 g
• WidthAquos C10: 5.8 mm narrowerAquos C10: 72 mm · Q2000: 77.8 mm
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)Aquos C10: Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) · Q2000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos C10: Dual · Q2000: Single
• DepthAquos C10: 1.9 mm thinnerAquos C10: 7.9 mm · Q2000: 9.8 mm
• HeightAquos C10: 14.2 mm shorterAquos C10: 141.8 mm · Q2000: 156 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos C10

   Height

   141.8 mm

   Width

   72 mm

   Depth

   7.9 mm

   Weight

   140 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.