Sharp Aquos R2 compact vs T-Mobile myTouch 3G 1.2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  myTouch 3G 1.2: 19 g lighter

  Aquos R2 compact:

  135 g

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  116 g

• Width

  myTouch 3G 1.2: 8 mm narrower

  Aquos R2 compact:

  64 mm

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  56 mm

• Screen diagonal

  myTouch 3G 1.2: 2 in smaller diagonal

  Aquos R2 compact:

  5.2 in

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  3.2 in

• Chipset

  Aquos R2 compact:

  Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm)

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  Qualcomm MSM7201A

• Depth

  Aquos R2 compact: 5.4 mm thinner

  Aquos R2 compact:

  9.3 mm

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  14.7 mm

• Height

  myTouch 3G 1.2: 18 mm shorter

  Aquos R2 compact:

  131 mm

  myTouch 3G 1.2:

  113 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos R2 compact

   Height:

   131 mm +18 mm versus myTouch 3G 1.2

   Width:

   64 mm +8 mm versus myTouch 3G 1.2

   Depth:

   9.3 mm

2. 2. myTouch 3G 1.2

   Height:

   113 mm

   Width:

   56 mm

   Depth:

   14.7 mm +5.4 mm versus Aquos R2 compact

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Aquos R2 compact

   Screen diagonal:

   5.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   19:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   67.5 cm²

2. 2. myTouch 3G 1.2

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   3:2

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   30.5 cm²

Aquos R2 compact has approximately 121.3% more rectangular screen area than myTouch 3G 1.2.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.