Sharp Aquos R2 vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthAquos R2: 3.8 mm narrowerAquos R2: 74 mm · Q2000: 77.8 mm
• Screen diagonalQ2000: 0.5 in smaller diagonalQ2000: 5.5 in · Aquos R2: 6 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)Aquos R2: Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 (10 nm) · Q2000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos R2: Dual · Q2000: Single
• DepthAquos R2: 0.8 mm thinnerAquos R2: 9 mm · Q2000: 9.8 mm
• Release year2018 / 2013Aquos R2: 2018 · Q2000: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos R2

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   74 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   181 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.