Sharp Aquos S2 vs Xolo Win Q1000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalWin Q1000: 0.5 in smaller diagonalWin Q1000: 5 in · Aquos S2: 5.5 in
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos S2: Dual · Win Q1000: Single
• DepthAquos S2: 0.9 mm thinnerAquos S2: 7.9 mm · Win Q1000: 8.8 mm
• Release year2017 / 2015Aquos S2: 2017 · Win Q1000: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos S2

   Height

   141.8 mm

   Width

   72 mm

   Depth

   7.9 mm

   Weight

   140 g

2. 2. Win Q1000

   Height

   143 mm

   Width

   71.3 mm

   Depth

   8.8 mm+0.9 mm versus Aquos S2

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Aquos S2 5.5 in · 17:9 About 80.7 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Win Q1000 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Aquos S2 has approximately 17.1% more rectangular screen area than Win Q1000.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.