Sharp Aquos S3 vs Xolo LT2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalLT2000: 0.5 in smaller diagonalLT2000: 5.5 in · Aquos S3: 6 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm)Aquos S3: Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) · LT2000: Qualcomm MSM8916 Snapdragon 410 (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos S3: Dual · LT2000: Single
• DepthAquos S3: 1.3 mm thinnerAquos S3: 8 mm · LT2000: 9.3 mm
• HeightAquos S3: 4.2 mm shorterAquos S3: 148.2 mm · LT2000: 152.4 mm
• Release year2018 / 2015Aquos S3: 2018 · LT2000: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos S3

   Height

   148.2 mm

   Width

   74.2 mm

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   165.4 g

2. 2. LT2000

   Height

   152.4 mm

   Width

   75 mm

   Depth

   9.3 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.