Sharp Aquos S3 vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos S3: 14.6 g lighterAquos S3: 165.4 g · Q2000: 180 g
• WidthAquos S3: 3.6 mm narrowerAquos S3: 74.2 mm · Q2000: 77.8 mm
• Screen diagonalQ2000: 0.5 in smaller diagonalQ2000: 5.5 in · Aquos S3: 6 in
• ChipsetQualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)Aquos S3: Qualcomm SDM630 Snapdragon 630 (14 nm) · Q2000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos S3: Dual · Q2000: Single
• DepthAquos S3: 1.8 mm thinnerAquos S3: 8 mm · Q2000: 9.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos S3

   Height

   148.2 mm

   Width

   74.2 mm

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   165.4 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.