Sharp Aquos S3 vs ZTE PF200

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthPF200: 8.2 mm narrowerPF200: 66 mm · Aquos S3: 74.2 mm
• Screen diagonalPF200: 1.5 in smaller diagonalPF200: 4.5 in · Aquos S3: 6 in
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos S3: Dual · PF200: Single
• DepthAquos S3: 0.5 mm thinnerAquos S3: 8 mm · PF200: 8.5 mm
• HeightPF200: 18.2 mm shorterPF200: 130 mm · Aquos S3: 148.2 mm
• Release year2018 / 2012Aquos S3: 2018 · PF200: 2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos S3

   Height

   148.2 mm+18.2 mm versus PF200

   Width

   74.2 mm+8.2 mm versus PF200

   Depth

   8 mm

   Weight

   165.4 g

2. 2. PF200

   Height

   130 mm

   Width

   66 mm

   Depth

   8.5 mm+0.5 mm versus Aquos S3

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Aquos S3 6 in · 18:9 About 92.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. PF200 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area

Aquos S3 has approximately 66.4% more rectangular screen area than PF200.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.