Sharp Aquos SH80F vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos SH80F: 45 g lighterAquos SH80F: 135 g · Q2000: 180 g
• WidthAquos SH80F: 13.8 mm narrowerAquos SH80F: 64 mm · Q2000: 77.8 mm
• Screen diagonalAquos SH80F: 1.3 in smaller diagonalAquos SH80F: 4.2 in · Q2000: 5.5 in
• DepthQ2000: 2.1 mm thinnerQ2000: 9.8 mm · Aquos SH80F: 11.9 mm
• HeightAquos SH80F: 29 mm shorterAquos SH80F: 127 mm · Q2000: 156 mm
• Release year2011 / 2013Aquos SH80F: 2011 · Q2000: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos SH80F

   Height

   127 mm

   Width

   64 mm

   Depth

   11.9 mm

   Weight

   135 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.