Sharp Aquos SH80F vs Xolo X910

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos SH80F: 15 g lighterAquos SH80F: 135 g · X910: 150 g
• DepthX910: 1.9 mm thinnerX910: 10 mm · Aquos SH80F: 11.9 mm
• Release year2011 / 2013Aquos SH80F: 2011 · X910: 2013

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos SH80F

   Height

   127 mm

   Width

   64 mm

   Depth

   11.9 mm+1.9 mm versus X910

   Weight

   135 g

2. 2. X910

   Height

   126 mm

   Width

   64.7 mm

   Depth

   10 mm

   Weight

   150 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Aquos SH80F 4.2 in · 16:9 About 48.6 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. X910 4.3 in · 16:9 About 51 cm² rectangular area

X910 has approximately 4.8% more rectangular screen area than Aquos SH80F.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.