Sharp Aquos V vs Wiko WIM

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Display technologyOLED versus LCDAquos V: LCD · WIM: OLED
• WeightWIM: 13 g lighterWIM: 160 g · Aquos V: 173 g
• Screen diagonalWIM: 0.4 in smaller diagonalWIM: 5.5 in · Aquos V: 5.9 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8953-Pro Snapdragon 626 (14 nm)Aquos V: Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) · WIM: Qualcomm MSM8953-Pro Snapdragon 626 (14 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos V: Dual · WIM: Single
• DepthWIM: 1.1 mm thinnerWIM: 7.9 mm · Aquos V: 9 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos V

   Height

   157 mm

   Width

   76 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   173 g

2. 2. WIM

   Height

   156.2 mm

   Width

   75.3 mm

   Depth

   7.9 mm

   Weight

   160 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.