Sharp Aquos V vs Xolo LT900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightLT900: 33 g lighterLT900: 140 g · Aquos V: 173 g
• WidthLT900: 10 mm narrowerLT900: 66 mm · Aquos V: 76 mm
• Screen diagonalLT900: 1.6 in smaller diagonalLT900: 4.3 in · Aquos V: 5.9 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) / Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 PlusAquos V: Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) · LT900: Qualcomm MSM8960 Snapdragon S4 Plus
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos V: Dual · LT900: Single
• DepthAquos V: 0.8 mm thinnerAquos V: 9 mm · LT900: 9.8 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos V

   Height

   157 mm

   Width

   76 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   173 g

2. 2. LT900

   Height

   128.7 mm

   Width

   66 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   140 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.