Sharp Aquos V vs Xolo Q900

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightQ900: 35 g lighterQ900: 138 g · Aquos V: 173 g
• WidthQ900: 6 mm narrowerQ900: 70 mm · Aquos V: 76 mm
• Screen diagonalQ900: 1.2 in smaller diagonalQ900: 4.7 in · Aquos V: 5.9 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)Aquos V: Qualcomm MSM8998 Snapdragon 835 (10 nm) · Q900: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• Rear camera layoutDual / SingleAquos V: Dual · Q900: Single
• DepthAquos V: 0.9 mm thinnerAquos V: 9 mm · Q900: 9.9 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos V

   Height

   157 mm

   Width

   76 mm

   Depth

   9 mm

   Weight

   173 g

2. 2. Q900

   Height

   137 mm

   Width

   70 mm

   Depth

   9.9 mm

   Weight

   138 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.