Sharp Aquos Xx vs Xolo Q2000

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightAquos Xx: 12 g lighterAquos Xx: 168 g · Q2000: 180 g
• WidthQ2000: 1.2 mm narrowerQ2000: 77.8 mm · Aquos Xx: 79 mm
• Screen diagonalQ2000: 0.2 in smaller diagonalQ2000: 5.5 in · Aquos Xx: 5.7 in
• ChipsetQualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) / Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)Aquos Xx: Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm) · Q2000: Mediatek MT6589 (28 nm)
• DepthAquos Xx: 1.1 mm thinnerAquos Xx: 8.7 mm · Q2000: 9.8 mm
• HeightAquos Xx: 10 mm shorterAquos Xx: 146 mm · Q2000: 156 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Aquos Xx

   Height

   146 mm

   Width

   79 mm

   Depth

   8.7 mm

   Weight

   168 g

2. 2. Q2000

   Height

   156 mm

   Width

   77.8 mm

   Depth

   9.8 mm

   Weight

   180 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.