T-Mobile MDA Compact V vs Vertu Signature Touch (2015)

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  MDA Compact V: 108 g lighter

  MDA Compact V:

  117 g

  Signature Touch (2015):

  225 g

• Width

  MDA Compact V: 20.9 mm narrower

  MDA Compact V:

  53.1 mm

  Signature Touch (2015):

  74 mm

• Screen diagonal

  MDA Compact V: 2 in smaller diagonal

  MDA Compact V:

  3.2 in

  Signature Touch (2015):

  5.2 in

• Chipset

  MDA Compact V:

  Qualcomm MSM7200A

  Signature Touch (2015):

  Qualcomm MSM8994 Snapdragon 810 (20 nm)

• Depth

  Signature Touch (2015): 2.9 mm thinner

  MDA Compact V:

  13.7 mm

  Signature Touch (2015):

  10.8 mm

• Height

  MDA Compact V: 47.1 mm shorter

  MDA Compact V:

  107.9 mm

  Signature Touch (2015):

  155 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. MDA Compact V

   Height:

   107.9 mm

   Width:

   53.1 mm

   Depth:

   13.7 mm +2.9 mm versus Signature Touch (2015)

2. 2. Signature Touch (2015)

   Height:

   155 mm +47.1 mm versus MDA Compact V

   Width:

   74 mm +20.9 mm versus MDA Compact V

   Depth:

   10.8 mm

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. MDA Compact V

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   29.1 cm²

2. 2. Signature Touch (2015)

   Screen diagonal:

   5.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   74.5 cm²

Signature Touch (2015) has approximately 155.8% more rectangular screen area than MDA Compact V.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.