Wiko Bloom2 vs Xolo Cube 5.0

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Screen diagonalBloom2: 0.3 in smaller diagonalBloom2: 4.7 in · Cube 5.0: 5 in
• Memory variantsAt 8 GB storageBloom2: 1 GB RAM · Cube 5.0: 2 GB RAM
• DepthCube 5.0: 1.9 mm thinnerCube 5.0: 6.9 mm · Bloom2: 8.8 mm
• HeightBloom2: 4 mm shorterBloom2: 139 mm · Cube 5.0: 143 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Bloom2

   Height

   139 mm

   Width

   71.6 mm

   Depth

   8.8 mm+1.9 mm versus Cube 5.0

   Weight

   151 g

2. 2. Cube 5.0

   Height

   143 mm+4 mm versus Bloom2

   Width

   71 mm

   Depth

   6.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Bloom2 4.7 in · 5:3 About 62.9 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Cube 5.0 5 in · 16:9 About 68.9 cm² rectangular area

Cube 5.0 has approximately 9.6% more rectangular screen area than Bloom2.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.