Xiaomi Mi 9T vs ZTE V875

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight

  V875: 65.6 g lighter

  Mi 9T:

  191 g

  V875:

  125.4 g

• Width

  V875: 14.3 mm narrower

  Mi 9T:

  74.3 mm

  V875:

  60 mm

• Screen diagonal

  V875: 3.19 in smaller diagonal

  Mi 9T:

  6.39 in

  V875:

  3.2 in

• Rear camera layout

  Mi 9T:

  Triple

  V875:

  Single

• Depth

  Mi 9T: 2.5 mm thinner

  Mi 9T:

  8.8 mm

  V875:

  11.3 mm

• Height

  V875: 34.7 mm shorter

  Mi 9T:

  156.7 mm

  V875:

  122 mm

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Mi 9T

   Height:

   156.7 mm +34.7 mm versus V875

   Width:

   74.3 mm +14.3 mm versus V875

   Depth:

   8.8 mm

2. 2. V875

   Height:

   122 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   11.3 mm +2.5 mm versus Mi 9T

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Mi 9T

   Screen diagonal:

   6.39 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   19.5:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   100.2 cm²

2. 2. V875

   Screen diagonal:

   3.2 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   31.7 cm²

Mi 9T has approximately 216.1% more rectangular screen area than V875.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.