Xolo Era 2X vs ZTE Avid Plus

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Chipset

  Era 2X:

  Mediatek MT6737 (28 nm)

  Avid Plus:

  Qualcomm MSM8909 Snapdragon 210 (28 nm)

• Depth

  Era 2X: 1.4 mm thinner

  Era 2X:

  9.5 mm

  Avid Plus:

  10.9 mm

• Release year

  Era 2X:

  2017

  Avid Plus:

  2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Era 2X

   Height:

   144 mm

   Width:

   72.3 mm

   Depth:

   9.5 mm

   Weight:

   Unknown

2. 2. Avid Plus

   Height:

   144.8 mm

   Width:

   72.9 mm

   Depth:

   10.9 mm +1.4 mm versus Era 2X

   Weight:

   164.4 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Era 2X

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

2. 2. Avid Plus

   Screen diagonal:

   5 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   68.9 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.