Xolo Q900s Plus vs ZTE Style Q

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  Style Q: 8.2 mm narrower

  Q900s Plus:

  67.2 mm

  Style Q:

  59 mm

• Screen diagonal

  Style Q: 1.9 in smaller diagonal

  Q900s Plus:

  4.7 in

  Style Q:

  2.8 in

• Depth

  Q900s Plus: 3.1 mm thinner

  Q900s Plus:

  7.2 mm

  Style Q:

  10.3 mm

• Height

  Style Q: 22.8 mm shorter

  Q900s Plus:

  135.8 mm

  Style Q:

  113 mm

• Release year

  Q900s Plus:

  2014

  Style Q:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Q900s Plus

   Height:

   135.8 mm +22.8 mm versus Style Q

   Width:

   67.2 mm +8.2 mm versus Style Q

   Depth:

   7.2 mm

2. 2. Style Q

   Height:

   113 mm

   Width:

   59 mm

   Depth:

   10.3 mm +3.1 mm versus Q900s Plus

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Q900s Plus

   Screen diagonal:

   4.7 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   16:9

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   60.9 cm²

2. 2. Style Q

   Screen diagonal:

   2.8 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   4:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   24.3 cm²

Q900s Plus has approximately 150.8% more rectangular screen area than Style Q.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

At least two unambiguous positive capacity values are needed for a chart. Original entries remain in the specifications.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.