ZTE E N72 vs ZTE V889M

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthV889M: 2.4 mm narrowerV889M: 63.6 mm · E N72: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalE N72: 1.5 in smaller diagonalE N72: 2.5 in · V889M: 4 in
• HeightE N72: 6.5 mm shorterE N72: 114 mm · V889M: 120.5 mm
• Release year2010 / 2012E N72: 2010 · V889M: 2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E N72

   Height

   114 mm

   Width

   66 mm+2.4 mm versus V889M

   Depth

   11.9 mm

   Weight

   130 g

2. 2. V889M

   Height

   120.5 mm+6.5 mm versus E N72

   Width

   63.6 mm

   Depth

   11.9 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E N72 2.5 in · 4:3 About 19.4 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. V889M 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area

V889M has approximately 135.3% more rectangular screen area than E N72.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

No unambiguous storage/RAM pairings are recorded. See the original specifications below.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.