ZTE Open vs ZTE PF200

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthOpen: 4 mm narrowerOpen: 62 mm · PF200: 66 mm
• Screen diagonalOpen: 1 in smaller diagonalOpen: 3.5 in · PF200: 4.5 in
• DepthPF200: 4 mm thinnerPF200: 8.5 mm · Open: 12.5 mm
• HeightOpen: 16 mm shorterOpen: 114 mm · PF200: 130 mm
• Release year2013 / 2012Open: 2013 · PF200: 2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. Open

   Height

   114 mm

   Width

   62 mm

   Depth

   12.5 mm+4 mm versus PF200

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. PF200

   Height

   130 mm+16 mm versus Open

   Width

   66 mm+4 mm versus Open

   Depth

   8.5 mm

   Weight

   Unknown

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. Open 3.5 in · 3:2 About 36.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. PF200 4.5 in · 16:9 About 55.8 cm² rectangular area

PF200 has approximately 53% more rectangular screen area than Open.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.