Asus E600 vs Oppo R817 Real

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Width

  E600: 3 mm narrower

  E600:

  60 mm

  R817 Real:

  63 mm

• Depth

  R817 Real: 3.8 mm thinner

  E600:

  13.5 mm

  R817 Real:

  9.7 mm

• Release year

  E600:

  2011

  R817 Real:

  2012

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E600

   Height:

   122 mm

   Width:

   60 mm

   Depth:

   13.5 mm +3.8 mm versus R817 Real

   Weight:

   Unknown

2. 2. R817 Real

   Height:

   123 mm

   Width:

   63 mm +3 mm versus E600

   Depth:

   9.7 mm

   Weight:

   125 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E600

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

2. 2. R817 Real

   Screen diagonal:

   4 in

   Aspect ratio (height:width):

   5:3

   Approximate rectangular screen area:

   45.5 cm²

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.