Asus E600 vs Yezz Andy 4.7T

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE600: 7.2 mm narrowerE600: 60 mm · Andy 4.7T: 67.2 mm
• Screen diagonalE600: 0.7 in smaller diagonalE600: 4 in · Andy 4.7T: 4.7 in
• DepthAndy 4.7T: 6.3 mm thinnerAndy 4.7T: 7.2 mm · E600: 13.5 mm
• HeightE600: 13.8 mm shorterE600: 122 mm · Andy 4.7T: 135.8 mm
• Release year2011 / 2016E600: 2011 · Andy 4.7T: 2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E600

   Height

   122 mm

   Width

   60 mm

   Depth

   13.5 mm+6.3 mm versus Andy 4.7T

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. Andy 4.7T

   Height

   135.8 mm+13.8 mm versus E600

   Width

   67.2 mm+7.2 mm versus E600

   Depth

   7.2 mm

   Weight

   120 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E600 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Andy 4.7T 4.7 in · 16:9 About 60.9 cm² rectangular area

Andy 4.7T has approximately 33.7% more rectangular screen area than E600.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.