Asus E600 vs ZTE Blade X9

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WidthE600: 17.2 mm narrowerE600: 60 mm · Blade X9: 77.2 mm
• Screen diagonalE600: 1.5 in smaller diagonalE600: 4 in · Blade X9: 5.5 in
• DepthBlade X9: 4.9 mm thinnerBlade X9: 8.6 mm · E600: 13.5 mm
• HeightE600: 33.3 mm shorterE600: 122 mm · Blade X9: 155.3 mm
• Release year2011 / 2015E600: 2011 · Blade X9: 2015

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. E600

   Height

   122 mm

   Width

   60 mm

   Depth

   13.5 mm+4.9 mm versus Blade X9

   Weight

   Unknown

2. 2. Blade X9

   Height

   155.3 mm+33.3 mm versus E600

   Width

   77.2 mm+17.2 mm versus E600

   Depth

   8.6 mm

   Weight

   160 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. E600 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. Blade X9 5.5 in · 16:9 About 83.4 cm² rectangular area

Blade X9 has approximately 83.1% more rectangular screen area than E600.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.