Micromax W900 vs Sharp Z2

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• WeightW900: 47 g lighterW900: 113 g · Z2: 160 g
• WidthW900: 21 mm narrowerW900: 55 mm · Z2: 76 mm
• Screen diagonalW900: 2.3 in smaller diagonalW900: 3.2 in · Z2: 5.5 in
• DepthZ2: 5.8 mm thinnerZ2: 8.4 mm · W900: 14.2 mm
• HeightW900: 41 mm shorterW900: 112 mm · Z2: 153 mm
• Release year2010 / 2016W900: 2010 · Z2: 2016

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. W900

   Height

   112 mm

   Width

   55 mm

   Depth

   14.2 mm

   Weight

   113 g

2. 2. Z2

   Height

   153 mm

   Width

   76 mm

   Depth

   8.4 mm

   Weight

   160 g

Open a section for more detail. Scroll inside a table to keep phone names visible; on narrow screens, swipe sideways or use the arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.