Nokia 702T vs Sonim XP7

Key differences

Calculated from recorded specifications using minimum difference thresholds. These are differences, not an overall ranking. For three phones, numeric highlights compare the two extremes.

• Weight702T: 163 g lighter702T: 127 g · XP7: 290 g
• Width702T: 11.7 mm narrower702T: 60.4 mm · XP7: 72.1 mm
• Screen diagonal702T: 1.54 in smaller diagonal702T: 2.46 in · XP7: 4 in
• Depth702T: 10.8 mm thinner702T: 10 mm · XP7: 20.8 mm
• Height702T: 19.9 mm shorter702T: 117.1 mm · XP7: 137 mm
• Release year2011 / 2014702T: 2011 · XP7: 2014

Relative size, not calibrated actual size. Front and side outlines share one scale and a bottom baseline. Generic outlines use recorded body dimensions, excluding camera bumps.

1. 1. 702T

   Height

   117.1 mm

   Width

   60.4 mm

   Depth

   10 mm

   Weight

   127 g

2. 2. XP7

   Height

   137 mm+19.9 mm versus 702T

   Width

   72.1 mm+11.7 mm versus 702T

   Depth

   20.8 mm+10.8 mm versus 702T

   Weight

   290 g

Screen size

Approximate rectangular screens calculated from recorded diagonal and aspect ratio at one relative scale. Rounded corners and cutouts are not subtracted. These are not phone outlines or calibrated actual sizes.

1. 1. 702T 2.46 in · 4:3 About 18.7 cm² rectangular area
2. 2. XP7 4 in · 5:3 About 45.5 cm² rectangular area

XP7 has approximately 143% more rectangular screen area than 702T.

Memory variants

Each row compares the same storage capacity. Cells show recorded RAM alternatives, not combined maxima. Not recorded does not mean unavailable in every market.

Practical features

Explicit Yes and No values are shown directly. Qualified or regional records retain their details. Unknown means the record is missing.

Battery capacity

Capacity is not battery life. No endurance test is implied.

Open a section for more detail. On narrow screens, swipe sideways or use Left/Right arrow keys while the table is focused. Unknown means missing data, not No. Recorded zero values are shown as recorded.